§ MENU
Approach
§ PRODUCTS · PLATINE Platine Vibe OS § PLATFORMS WE LEAD ON Dynamics 365 Business Central Project Online · Migration
§ THE PRACTICE Engagements Industries § THINKING & WRITING Field Notes
About Contact → Français → Book a call
ESSAY · Q1 2026 · 5-MIN READ

On being agnostic in tools, prescriptive in methods.

Why Platine refuses to lead with a technology stack, and what that means for how engagements are sold and delivered.

TL;DR
  • Tool-led firms sell capacity. Method-led firms sell discipline. The economics differ, so does the buyer.
  • Being prescriptive in method is not rigidity; it is the discipline that makes flexibility in tooling possible.
  • The buyer who appreciates this distinction is a different kind of buyer than the one who shops on stack alignment.

Most consulting firms organize around a stack. Microsoft shop. Salesforce shop. SAP shop. The conversation with a prospect begins with what they've already bought. The proposal is shaped by what the firm is certified in.

Platine is not organized that way. We have a methodology, a four-phase loop that runs every engagement, and a deliberate refusal to lead with the tooling. The conversation begins with what the operator's week looks like, not what license the buyer signed.

The cost of being tool-agnostic

Being tool-agnostic is more expensive to maintain than being tool-led. We have to keep our practice broad enough to credibly evaluate Microsoft, Salesforce, the open-source stack, and the long tail of niche SaaS. We have to refuse engagements where we'd be the wrong fit even though they'd generate revenue. We have to say no when the right answer is "you should hire someone else."

The payoff: when we recommend Microsoft Dynamics, the buyer knows we considered the alternatives. When we recommend a custom build, they know we ruled out the off-the-shelf options. The recommendation comes with credibility because it could have come out differently.

The cost of being prescriptive in method

Being prescriptive in method costs us flexibility on engagement structure. Every Platine engagement runs the same four-phase loop. Every engagement produces the same three artifacts (diagnostic report, decision ledger, transition plan). We do not negotiate this, even when buyers ask us to.

The payoff: predictability. The buyer knows what they're getting. The team knows how to deliver it. The handoff at the end is clean because the artifacts are standard.

The discipline in our method is what makes our tool flexibility possible. Without the method, agnosticism is just indecision.

Who this is for

Not every buyer wants this. Some buyers want to hire a Microsoft shop to install Microsoft. Some want a Salesforce shop to install Salesforce. That's a legitimate purchase. We are not the right firm for it.

The buyer who wants Platine is the one whose first sentence is something like: "We bought X three years ago and it isn't working, but I'm not sure if X is the problem or our configuration is." That diagnostic question is where we earn our fee.

§, RELATED

More from the field.

§ FN · INTERROGATIVE

Want to discuss a similar engagement?

Schedule
→ Book a 30-minute call
All notes
→ Browse all field notes
Phone
514-546-0711