§ MENU
Approach
§ PRODUCTS · PLATINE Platine Vibe OS § PLATFORMS WE LEAD ON Dynamics 365 Business Central Project Online · Migration
§ THE PRACTICE Engagements Industries § THINKING & WRITING Field Notes
About Contact → Français → Book a call
AI-LAB · MTL · ENGAGEMENT

AI Strategy & Intelligent Operations.

Identify the AI use cases that matter. Deploy the agents that earn their place. Measure what actually changes.

→ Discuss your context ↓ Read engagement
§ 01 · THE PATTERN

What we keep seeing.

Most enterprise AI initiatives stall after proof-of-concept. The capability is there, the licenses are paid for, the demos look convincing, and yet six months later, operator workflows have not changed, and the board is still asking when the ROI lands.

The gap is rarely the model. It is the strategy underneath. Tool-led approaches start with what was bought and hunt for use cases that might justify it. The discipline runs the other direction, use cases first, agents second, tools last.

§ 02 · OUR APPROACH

Our approach.

We start with use cases, not tools. Listen, we interview operators and surface the moments where AI would actually compound their work. Diagnose, we map feasibility, data readiness, and governance gaps. Design, we specify intelligent agents and automation flows that sit inside workflows the team already uses. Deliver, we build, evaluate, deploy, and measure.

We are tool-agnostic. Microsoft Copilot, Anthropic Claude, OpenAI, custom-trained models, open-source agent frameworks, we recommend what fits your data, your security profile, and your operators. We will tell you when AI is the wrong answer.

Every engagement ships with an evaluation harness, automated tests for accuracy, hallucination rate, and edge-case behaviour. AI without evals is hope; AI with evals is engineering.

→ Read the full methodology

§ 03 · INDUSTRY CONTEXT

What the data shows.

Outcomes are best understood against the broader landscape. Below, published benchmarks from independent research that frame this engagement type.

  1. 30%

    Of generative-AI projects will be abandoned after proof-of-concept by end of 2025, driven by poor data, inadequate governance, and unclear business value.

    — Gartner, July 2024
  2. 72%

    Of organizations now use AI in at least one business function, up from 55% the prior year. Adoption is no longer the question; durable value is.

    — McKinsey, "The State of AI in Early 2024"
  3. 26%

    Of companies have developed the capabilities to move beyond AI proofs-of-concept and actually generate value at scale. The remaining majority stall.

    — BCG, "Where's the Value in AI?", October 2024
§ 04 · TOOLS WE WORK WITH

Capability, not headline.

We list these because you'll ask. We list them last because they're the means, not the engagement.

  • Microsoft Copilot, Microsoft 365 · Copilot Studio · Power Platform integration
  • Anthropic Claude, Sonnet · Opus · Claude Agent SDK
  • OpenAI, GPT-4o · Assistants API · custom GPTs
  • Open-source agent frameworks, LangGraph · CrewAI · n8n
  • Vector & retrieval, Pinecone · Weaviate · pgvector · Azure AI Search
  • Evaluation & governance, eval harnesses · prompt registries · audit logs
  • Custom-trained models, fine-tuning on your data when off-the-shelf doesn't fit
§ 05 · QUESTIONS

Common questions.

01 Is this just Copilot consulting? +
No. Copilot is one tool, the right one for some use cases, the wrong one for others. We design the use case first, then pick the model. Sometimes that's Copilot. Sometimes it's Claude, GPT, an open-source agent, or a fine-tuned model on your infrastructure.
02 How do you handle data privacy with AI? +
Privacy-by-design is the default. We assess data sensitivity in Phase 02, and the architecture in Phase 03 reflects it, on-prem inference, API-tier guarantees, prompt redaction, retention controls. Every engagement is reviewed against Loi 25.
03 Will AI replace our team? +
We design for augmentation, not displacement. AI agents earn their place when operators choose them, and they only earn that when the integration is good. We measure whether your team's work improved, not whether headcount dropped.
04 What if we are not "AI-ready"? +
Most organizations aren't, and "AI readiness" is a moving target. We start with one use case, ship it, measure it, and use what we learned to inform the next. Readiness is built engagement by engagement, not declared in a maturity model.
05 How do we measure AI ROI? +
Against the Phase 02 baseline. We measure operator time saved, error rates avoided, decisions accelerated, whichever maps to the use case. The eval harness keeps us honest as the model and the workflow evolve.
06 What about hallucinations? +
Hallucinations are a design problem, not a model problem. We mitigate with retrieval grounding, structured outputs, evaluation gates, and human-in-the-loop where stakes are high. The eval harness flags regressions.
§, INTERROGATIVE

Tell us where you are.
We'll tell you what's possible.

Schedule
→ Book a 30-minute call
Phone
514-546-0711
Email
[email protected]
Other engagements
→ View all three engagement types